Continuing the evolution of robotics technology in total knee arthroplasty
The NAVIO Surgical System has demonstrated clinical performance by offering real-time characterization of bone and cartilage, and high-level accuracy for bone preparation and gap balancing in total knee arthroplasty (TKA)1-8.
NAVIO 7.0 software has been developed to offer:
 |
Improved efficiency through a reduction in mandatory steps and a more surgeon-driven workflow, regardless of philosophy or preference.
|
 |
Improved usability due to a bone preparation update and more flexible, customizable workflow options.
|
 |
A shorter learning curve with user interface updates and completion feedback.
|
Aiming to offer the accuracy1-8 patients deserve, while enhancing the surgeon’s workload and user experience. Estimated efficiencies:*
What’s new with NAVIO 7.0?
- New surgical preferences for joint laxity, femur rotational axis, tibial resection depth and femur implant reference.
- Updated workflow interface reduces leg manipulations, with streamlined mechanical axis definition and grouped collection of kinematic and surface data.
- Single-stage, patient specific planning
- Detailed alignment and deformity information, intraoperative implant change and a troubleshooting info widget.
- Effective distal punch tool to prepare fixation holes for AP cutting guide, compatible with distal burring.
- Instant access to intraoperative case information mid-procedure.
- Watch: virtual bone modelling with built-in auto-rotation and faster mapping:
The freedom of robotics in your hands
To discover how NAVIO Robotics and the new NAVIO 7.0 software update could enhance your TKA practice, contact us to enquire about a live demonstration.
Read how NAVIO Handheld Robotics contributes to patient outcomes, accuracy and procedural efficiencies in TKA.
Find out more about the NAVIO Surgical System, and experience the freedom of robotics in your hands.
*compared to NAVIO software version 6.0/6.1 SW
References:
1) Herry Y, Batailler C, Lording T, Servien E, Neyret P, Lustig S. Improved joint-line restitution in unicompartmental knee arthroplasty using a robotic-assisted surgical technique. Int Orthop. 2017;41:2265-2271.
2) Batailler C, White N, Ranaldi F, Neyret P, Servien E, Lustig S. Improved implant position and lower revision rate with robotic-assisted unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. European Society of Sports Traumatology, Knee Surgery, Arthroscopy (ESSKA) 2018.
3) Jaramaz B, Nikou C, Casper M, Grosse S, Mitra R. Accuracy validation of semi-active robotic application for patellofemoral arthroplasty. Paper presented at: International Society for Computer Assisted Orthopaedic Surgery; June 17-20, 2015; Vancover, Canada.
4) Jaramaz B, Mitra R, Nikou C, Kung C. Technique and Accuracy Assessment of a Novel Image-Free Handheld Robot for knee Arthroplasty in Bi-Cruiciate Retaining Total Knee Replacement. EPiC Series in Health Sciences. 2018;2:98-101.
5) Gregori A, Picard F, Bellemans J, Smith J, Simone A. Handheld precision sculpting tool for unicondylar knee arthroplasty. A clinical review. Abstract presented at: 15th EFORT Congress; June 4-6, 2014; London, UK.
6) Smith JR, Picard F, Lonner J, Hamlin B, Rowe P, Riches P, Deakin A. The accuracy of a robotically-controlled freehand sculpting tool for unicondylar knee arthroplasty. Congress of the International Society of Biomechanics. 4-9 August, 2013. Natal, Brazil.
7) Gustke K, Golladay G, Roche MW, Jerry G, Elson LC, Anderson CR. Increased Patient Satisfaction After Total Knee replacement using sensor-guided technology. Bone Joint J 2014;96-B:1333–8.
8) Gregori A, Picard F, Lonner J, Smith J, Jaramaz B. Accuracy of imageless robotically assisted unicondylar knee arthroplasty. Paper presented at: International Society for Computer Assisted Orthopaedic Surgery; June 17-20, 2015; Vancover, Canada.